pantantrollo

Members
  • Content Count

    582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Release Note6

Everything posted by pantantrollo

  1. I think the best thing is to get rid of it completely. As of the 31st of this month, without security patches, it will be a drain of anything not good That added to that mx5, it has blink 69, also discouraged because of how old it is
  2. If this is the best you can do, I better wait for Maxthon v7 😰 Please !!!!, put in configuration a checkbox to disable maxthon as the default browser and never ask for it again (while the checkbox is activated)
  3. Official website, download the version maxthon_portable_6.1.0.1300_beta_x64.7z, not the latest version
  4. We need a "check box" in options, to activate / deactivate the default browser, as previous versions had and other browsers have
  5. We need a "check box" in options, to activate / deactivate the default browser, as previous versions had and other browsers have
  6. Yes, and it installs silently, without any kind of warning in 😄 \ Users \ xxxxx \ AppData \ Local \ Maxthon \ Application, when the portable version is still on the original site without any changes. We go that even if you have the portable version, you install if or if the installable version, without permission, and where it has not been told 😞 By the way, the portable version, every time it is run, it keeps asking for permission, I imagine to be set as the default or default of the URL protocol "path maxthon.exe" --mx-url-protocol --mx-name=TwF4 (more characters)==
  7. Can you implement a tool to transfer the passwd from mx5 to mx6 locally WITHOUT having to have a maxthon account or anything to do with synchronizing? Also another tool to transfer the QA from mx5 to mx6, in local nothing to synchronize?
  8. I'm watching the latest mx6 alphas, and I don't like the way it's going. Basically, if you don't implement the features that defined maxthon, I don't know what will be the reason to choose this browser over any chrome version or derivatives (each one with its own ideas and that define its browser, example of vivaldi, opera etc, to name a few) Losing faith for moments 😞
  9. As you have been told in another post with the same suggestion, I think you should look for information about what an SSL certificate is, and why what you are asking for is not applicable Same here, and more when what I want is a simple "web browser", without telemetries or weird shit (Bitelf style with things I can't even uninstall)
  10. This will be optional? Will there be any way for any user to opt out of the whole bigcoinc, biddata, bigXXX related theme that has the browser built in? We will be able to "be free" to choose if we want such options BIGxxx?
  11. As an addition to what Toni says, which I affirm Community? but is there a community? If these forums, which could be the basis of your representation, do not have any movement to be able to be called, "community".
  12. When it arrives, it will already have a very delayed blink core (more insecure and without the security corrections that are added)
  13. Did you deactivate the extension, or stopped blocking the page you mentioned? To activate it again, from settings / functions and addons To re-block the page, from the extension itself (red icon, top right)
  14. First, I think you should upgrade to some newer stable version. Since version that you have been quite stable versions. Locate within your profile de maxthon, the \AdBlock\ folder, with closed maxthon, delete it or better rename it. In theory, you will only see a single list, with which you will have to reconfigure it.
  15. !!! AT LAST !!!!, v5.2.4.3000 Portable Tested with the 3 links of this same thread (I've tried some more and it seems to work) Hoping it will not bother the next time you change core blink to a more modern one
  16. If you talk to me about banks, surely we are, again, talking about different things. In my country, Spain, (although I just had a quick look at some Frances), as far as I know, no bank uses a digital certificate for login, they are only used by state administrations and autonomous communities for negotiations with the public. I went through the forum in Spain to see if there was movement, and to be able to throw a question there as a test. It would not be too much for you to propose in that forum, that they will refuel you if they have errors with digital certificates of the fnmt, or an
  17. I take it for granted that you are not deceiving me, of course, but I have not seen any evidence that what you say has worked (on the contrary, I have provided evidence to the contrary), and that is what I am asking. Reading the thread, until very recently, you did not understand what we were talking about when talking about a digital certificate, later not even the dev team seemed to have any to try these configurations, as you will understand, the fact that you have solved, as you say , the problems to some users, does not guarantee the fact that it is what has been fixed, and more with
  18. I understand that you have tested them too with other users, is that true? Can you put the screenshots or videos of how it works correctly what I said above? Because I'm putting in this thread a lot of info commenting on the error, but I do not see that after that statement you have put something that tells me otherwise. Does your digital certificate have a passwd for use when the browser accesses this certificate? Can you confirm this last?
  19. Sorry to disappoint the development team, but it has NOT been corrected, I'm sorry for you (I manage a lot of machines with different OS and configurations and the same thing happens in all of them) As it is said here, it is not a good idea to sell the milk before having the cow. The truth is that after many months with this problem I am already tired of lending my time and desire, seriously, and more seeing that I think they do not even test what is indicated and how they are indicated. Because one thing is that they do not know how to fix it, I would understand it, but another is t
  20. I, (neither my machine or configuration), we have no problem Feeling it a lot is not going to be possible. On the one hand the wifi connection that I have (3 mg down / 1 mg up) "barely" gives for web browsing, and on the other the issue of digital certificates is sensitive enough to allow support on that same issue via remote control. You just have to check it (as it has been repeated throughout all these previous months), with the series 5.1.xxx (and previous series), and you will quickly see what is happening (which you probably already know too well, but not how to fix it)
  21. It seems that there is less work left to do At least with the blink engine, it finally asks for the digital certificate, although it still gives an error when it should ask for the password to access the certificate In contrast with IE engine or versions 5.1.xxx, this is the result