luis_v Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Edge - 96.5 Milisegundos Firefox - 184.5 Milisegundos Chrome - 198.7 Milisegundos Maxthon 4.9.0.2400 Beta - 301.1 Mlisegundos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prakash Kodali Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 understanding that maxthon is very slow to load or what... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis_v Posted December 26, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 1 hour ago, Prakash Kodali said: understanding that maxthon is very slow to load or what... Maxthon is losing speed is not the same as before. Prior to the Test I Maxthon and was between 140 and 150 milliseconds. Now I pass the test and what you see in the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AT Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 51 minutes ago, luis_v said: Maxthon is losing speed is not the same as before. Prior to the Test I Maxthon and was between 140 and 150 milliseconds. Now I pass the test and what you see in the picture Speed was a very good advantage of Maxthon. Now, besides slow, have Google CSE and some chinese advertisements. // La velocidad era una gran ventaja de Maxthon. Ahora, aparte de lento, está la inclusión de Google CSE y publicidad china. Cada día me gusta menos Maxthon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLeopard Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 3 hours ago, AT said: Speed was a very good advantage of Maxthon. Now, besides slow, have Google CSE and some chinese advertisements. // La velocidad era una gran ventaja de Maxthon. Ahora, aparte de lento, está la inclusión de Google CSE y publicidad china. Cada día me gusta menos Maxthon. I had a similar speed finding when running the Peacekeeper benchmark suite on 4.9.0.2400. It runs a bout 75% of the speeds I found among the better versions of 4.4.x series. 3100+ for 4.9.x vs. 4100+ for 4.4.x. Extremely disappointing! I still hold out hope for better if they eventually turn on gpu hardware acceleration. <<SL>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AT Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 7 minutes ago, SnowLeopard said: I had a similar speed finding when running the Peacekeeper benchmark suite on 4.9.0.2400. It runs a bout 75% of the speeds I found among the better versions of 4.4.x series. 3100+ for 4.9.x vs. 4100+ for 4.4.x. Extremely disappointing! I still hold out hope for better if they eventually turn on gpu hardware acceleration. <<SL>> I guess we must wait for next version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ldfa Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 Over benchmarks with some other browser : Maxthon 4.4.8.1000 : - HTML5Test : 467 - Kraken : 1167.4 - Octane : 27914 Nitro 1.1.1.950 : - HTML5Test : 500 - Kraken : 1097.6 - Octane : 31979 Maxthon 4.9.0.2400 : - HTML5Test : 500 - Kraken : 1094.0 - Octane : 33649 UC Browser 5.5.8807.1010 : - Html5Test : 526 - Kraken : 936.8 - Octane : 35676 Firefox 43.0.1 : - HTML5Test : 468 - Kraken : 1010.9 - Octane : 30333 Google Chrome 47.0.2526.106 : - HTML5Test : 521 - Kraken : 957.9 - Octane : 35013 Opera 34.0.2036.42 : - HTML5Test :520 - Kraken : 975.9 - Octane : 34053 Vivaldi 1.0.344.37 Bêta 2 : - HTML5Test : 521 - Kraken : 965.0 - Octane : 33313 Edge 13.10586 : - HTML5Test : 453 - Kraken : 1002.8 - Octane : 38558 See ya, Ldfa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLeopard Posted December 26, 2015 Report Share Posted December 26, 2015 10 hours ago, Ldfa said: Over benchmarks with some other browser : Maxthon 4.4.8.1000 : - HTML5Test : 467 - Kraken : 1167.4 - Octane : 27914 Nitro 1.1.1.950 : - HTML5Test : 500 - Kraken : 1097.6 - Octane : 31979 Maxthon 4.9.0.2400 : - HTML5Test : 500 - Kraken : 1094.0 - Octane : 33649 I did some tests with the same benchmark engines with and without ABP enabled. Here are my results: (ABP on) (ABP off) Mx 4.4.8.1000 html5test 467 467 higher=better Kraken 1564.8ms +/- 1.3% 1580.4ms +/- 2.6% lower=better Octane error due to ABP 18382 higher=better Mx 4.9.0.2400 html5test 500 500 Kraken 1618.8ms +/- 2.5% 1653.2ms +/- 2.3% Octane 22183 22589 Nitro 1.1.1.950 html5test 500 500 Kraken 1572.6ms +/- 0.9% 1516.2ms +/- 0.7% Octane 22531 22889 EDIT - Added 4.2.0.2400 html5test 467 Kraken 1613.7ms +/- 1.2% Octane 18075 I guess you just have a better machine than I do. Oh well it's not by my choice now. But I don't have a history of tests with these engines except html5test to compare my machine to earlier versions' performance in the same tests. I wonder how 4.2.0.2400 will do? It was the last version of MCB that had close to full gpu acceleration support. I might give it a run. As you see I inserted the results for 4.2.0.2400 above and it was about equal with 4.4.8.1000 and Nitro 1.1.1.950 and definitely better that 4.9.0.2400 on Kraken and equal to 4.4.8.1000 on html5test but worse that 4.9.0.2400 and Nitro on Octane. I do recall that Mx4 used to be up to 517 on html5test but has regressed in the later 4.4.x versions and is still stuck in that regression with 4.9. This has also been the story on the Peacekeeper benchmark suite it improved into the 4100-4200 score range and has now regressed to the 3000's in both 4.4.8.1000 and 4.9.0.2400. <<SL>> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis_v Posted December 27, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2015 4 hours ago, SnowLeopard said: I did some tests with the same benchmark engines with and without ABP enabled. Here are my results: (ABP on) (ABP off) Mx 4.4.8.1000 html5test 467 467 higher=better Kraken 1564.8ms +/- 1.3% 1580.4ms +/- 2.6% lower=better Octane error due to ABP 18382 higher=better Mx 4.9.0.2400 html5test 500 500 Kraken 1618.8ms +/- 2.5% 1653.2ms +/- 2.3% Octane 22183 22589 Nitro 1.1.1.950 html5test 500 500 Kraken 1572.6ms +/- 0.9% 1516.2ms +/- 0.7% Octane 22531 22889 EDIT - Added 4.2.0.2400 html5test 467 Kraken 1613.7ms +/- 1.2% Octane 18075 I guess you just have a better machine than I do. Oh well it's not by my choice now. But I don't have a history of tests with these engines except html5test to compare my machine to earlier versions' performance in the same tests. I wonder how 4.2.0.2400 will do? It was the last version of MCB that had close to full gpu acceleration support. I might give it a run. As you see I inserted the results for 4.2.0.2400 above and it was about equal with 4.4.8.1000 and Nitro 1.1.1.950 and definitely better that 4.9.0.2400 on Kraken and equal to 4.4.8.1000 on html5test but worse that 4.9.0.2400 and Nitro on Octane. I do recall that Mx4 used to be up to 517 on html5test but has regressed in the later 4.4.x versions and is still stuck in that regression with 4.9. This has also been the story on the Peacekeeper benchmark suite it improved into the 4100-4200 score range and has now regressed to the 3000's in both 4.4.8.1000 and 4.9.0.2400. <<SL>> Maxthon is decreasing. I hope that the final version is totally different from what I'm seeing in Beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secret-HQ Posted December 27, 2015 Report Share Posted December 27, 2015 2 hours ago, luis_v said: Maxthon is decreasing. I hope that the final version is totally different from what I'm seeing in Beta. QuickAccess is draggy, and the Favorites Manager is nearly unusable with more than a hundred or so Favorites, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed, too. Glad to have the new core in place, but the performance difference is disheartening. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHYR Posted December 27, 2015 Report Share Posted December 27, 2015 I have 272 favorites in 20 or so folders, there is no issue whatsoever in favorites manager. Nor do I have issues rearranging favorites directly in the side bar(one of your other posts). Everything regarding favorites is quick and snappy. I do have a little latency when opening QA the first time on booting M4(about 2 seconds for all tiles to show), but after that it's fine(opening instantly). I do have problems on some websites with slow loading and scrolling, esp if I have many tabs open. Edit: Regarding favorites, I suspect you might have imported physically(copying an old favorites folder) your favorites from a previous version? If so, I would suggest trusting favorites sync and let it do the updating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.