BugSir006

Staff
  • Content Count

    3,912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Posts posted by BugSir006


  1. 7 hours ago, SnowLeopard said:

    Why not post and pin the 'skin file' in this board so all interested can try their hand?

    Just wondering what's the holdup?

     

    This package contains :

    mx5skin_edge: Edge skin resource files.

    mx5skin_tabdown: Skin resource files of moving tab down.

    MxFilePackage: The tool of packing skin file.

    build.dat: Batch tool.

    mx5.mxskin: Output file after running build.bat

    doc\

    Maxthon5_Skin.rar

    • Like 1

  2. On 1/13/2019 at 9:38 AM, Cute Little Ahri said:

    where are the skins, or atleast show us how to make skins, goddamn has this browser been given up on or something.

    I will send the skin file to you via private message.


  3. This extension last updated on 10/23/2014, and it is not available for the latest Maxthon 5, the dev team has helped solve this issue, would you like to update it? If you don't contact us in two weeks, we will remove it from Maxthon extension center and upload by our official account.

    If you can reach this author please help let him/her know. Thank you! :Smiling_Face_Emoji_with_Blushed_Cheeks_42x42:

     

    QQ截图20180912161002.png

    • Like 1

  4. On 9/10/2018 at 1:38 AM, A.S. said:

    Did Lonely Atom delete tracking scripts or just use old safe version?
    Or this method of tracking just does not work on Maxthon?

    It hasn't tracked cookies and browsing history from Maxthon. If you have Fiddler, you could try to check it out and contrast with Chrome browser.


  5. On 9/8/2018 at 1:07 AM, A.S. said:

    Is Stylish for Maxthon official?
    Here're not so many official extensions and ports. I know olny three: LastPass, VKOpt and AdBlock Plus. Other extensions in most cases are unofficial ports from funboys. Is Stylish too?

    Thank you for your feedback. The dev team has tested, it won't track request from Maxthon browser, and these aren't official extensions.

    • Like 1

  6. 20 minutes ago, pantantrollo said:

    I take it for granted that you are not deceiving me, of course, but I have not seen any evidence that what you say has worked (on the contrary, I have provided evidence to the contrary), and that is what I am asking.

    Reading the thread, until very recently, you did not understand what we were talking about when talking about a digital certificate, later not even the dev team seemed to have any to try these configurations, as you will understand, the fact that you have solved, as you say , the problems to some users, does not guarantee the fact that it is what has been fixed, and more without those tests that I ask (captures, videos, etc.), because we may be talking about different things again, isto what happened throughout this post

    And as I told you, if by users, we understand different machines, I already told you that in which I manage does NOT work as it should, neither in current OS like win10, neither in win8.1, nor in win7 (with different configurations, different installed programs, newly installed OS, etc, and always from the maxthon 5.2.xxx series, with clean maxthon installations.

    Sincerely, I do not know the development team, has come to perform as many tests as I do in this 4 months in different machines, seriously, I only ask you, those tests that work for you, if not, I can not believe you, I'm sorry. (I know what I see, and you have also seen the same, but I have not seen anything that you tell me)

    Mostly this issue happens on the bank website, we surely don't have those bank accounts to reproduce. So the dev team debugs and troubleshoots this issue on the users' device. That is the reason I cannot give you a screenshot or video. The dev team is writing the certificate and setting up the environment to debug again.


  7. 13 hours ago, pantantrollo said:

     

    I understand that you have tested them too with other users, is that true?

    Can you put the screenshots or videos of how it works correctly what I said above?

    Because I'm putting in this thread a lot of info commenting on the error, but I do not see that after that statement you have put something that tells me otherwise.

    Does your digital certificate have a passwd for use when the browser accesses this certificate? Can you confirm this last?

    We have had connected some users having the similar issue and solved this bug. In the internal test version, we released the changelog regarding the certificate issue. I totally don't have any reason to cheat you here and just want to help every user solve their issue. If you still experience the issue and don't available to use the TeamViewer, we will continue contacting other users having this issue and solve it again. 


  8. 8 minutes ago, pantantrollo said:

    Sorry to disappoint the development team, but it has NOT been corrected, I'm sorry for you (I manage a lot of machines with different OS and configurations and the same thing happens in all of them)

    As it is said here, it is not a good idea to sell the milk before having the cow.

    The truth is that after many months with this problem I am already tired of lending my time and desire, seriously, and more seeing that I think they do not even test what is indicated and how they are indicated. Because one thing is that they do not know how to fix it, I would understand it, but another is that even if they do not know what they are talking about, what makes them think

    Have checked and tested with others users...


  9. 7 minutes ago, pantantrollo said:

    I, (neither my machine or configuration), we have no problem :)

    Feeling it a lot is not going to be possible. On the one hand the wifi connection that I have (3 mg down / 1 mg up) "barely" gives for web browsing, and on the other the issue of digital certificates is sensitive enough to allow support on that same issue via remote control.

    You just have to check it (as it has been repeated throughout all these previous months), with the series 5.1.xxx (and previous series), and you will quickly see what is happening (which you probably already know too well, but not how to fix it)

    This issue has been fixed in the version 5.2.4.2000, now you still experience it, so our engineers hope to solve it for you. If you are not available, we will try to contact other users who have the similar issue.

    • Like 1

  10. 15 hours ago, pantantrollo said:

    With all my respect to the maxhon team, we've been doing this for almost 5 months, since the first 5.2.xxx, I think that in software issues, it's a long time.

    We can't change it casually without a certificate.There is no such scene in our area(China) The result maybe when it can be fixed and whether can be fixed.

    Please provide us a Instant messaging tool such as skype or telegram, you can send me ur account via pm. Then we can communicate on this issue timely