• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


 Content Type 



Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Release Note6

Everything posted by pantantrollo

  1. Please, how can you ask me to send you my digital certificate for personal use? , With all due respect, I think that with this request, I think that you do not really know what you are trying to fix, and more seeing the screenshots that you put me up here. And if what you want are the SSL certificates of the web, you can save them yourself. What would you want me to send them to you? But I'm telling you, the screenshots you mention do not make reference to the problem, since they are totally different things
  2. You say it yourself, then, why develop / improve an SDK for extensions, if we already have one created and running with chrome?
  3. Being a widely demanded feature, it may happen that the new "nitro" version ends up killing maxthon, if the latter fails to incorporate this feature. IMHO, in a market where the big ones create the trends, I do not think that Maxthon, which is a great browser, suits you to be closed in quantity and quality of options (chrome extensions, flags chrome, these also demanded, etc), you just have to look at the browsers that are based on chrome
  4. I imagine you can try with any certificate that you have for the corresponding websites. Does anyone in Maxthon Dev use an electronic certificate in their country? I think that in the screenshots it looks perfectly, if I have time, I will try to upload a video.
  5. I copy and paste the same web. (in order to show the dialog, you must have a valid certificate installed, otherwise, obviously it will not jump). No additional information is needed for the login, which is precisely what it is about when using the certificate, to log in Is enough, I think, documented in my post of this thread, with the captures, which in other browsers works without problems
  6. With all the webs that request digital certificates? , I recommend you change your qa-engineer Core, IE, egde, ok Core, gecko, quantum, ok Core, blink, (opera, vivaldi, chrome, etc), ok !!!! Maxthon before series 5.2, !!! , ok We have been like this, almost 2 months bad, bad, bad, support (and image) you are giving people who go through this forums
  7. Not only do they ignore the users, but they ignore the users who, in good faith, contribute their time to give free support to the company and in a disinterested way, and it is that same company that looks the other way, when it is precisely that what else should you take care of, your free support towards the other users of these forums.
  8. I came with the illusion of trying the new version, v., and check if it was fixed, but the custom is already the opposite, do not surprise me We will see in the new series 5.2.3.x what is happening. (little by little moving data other browsers, which penalty of not being able to export the user / pass :-() BugSirxxx, where are you?
  9. PLAS! , PLAS! PLAS! (applause to the development / support team) More than a month and a half, and we continue exactly the same, with a key feature, in any browser, which does not work in this one. v. portable
  10. VERGONZOSO, we continue with the same problem of access to web with digital certificate (with blink engine, with IE yes it works) v. Other browsers with blink engine, work OK
  11. How do you know or verify that google uses that string you mention? Will you refire to look for a page that the user-agent tells you and check it from that same search instead of going directly to the page? I do not know, in my case, whether searching from google or loading the page directly, I get the same (v. (if that is what you were referring to) Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0, WOW64) AppleWebKit / 537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome / 55.0.2883.75 Safari / 537.36 Maxthon / In your case, the correct one is the second, I think maxthon carries the core 61
  12. Precisely in the series 5.2, has updated the core from old core 55, so imagine how is the matter :-)
  13. Totally agree. Personally every this is looking grotesque. If this same error had occurred in any other renowned browser, already would have fallen sticks in some digital media. If you look at the changelogs of the series v.4.9 and the beginning of the series v.5, there is a difference in the list of errors that have been corrected, brutal compared to what has been going on for a few months. Or resources have been diverted to things like cryptocurrencies and other things, or the thing looks worse and is being left to die
  14. They are different topics. It does not have to do with the SSL / TLS connections, but with the request of the window that gives access to our digital certificate (the one that has it, of course) Of all, you will see that it works in other browsers, including maxthon v5.1, and it does not work in maxthon 5.2
  15. You will not have a valid certificate. In my case, they work perfectly, Cent-browser, chromiun, Opera, and above all, maxthon 5.1 chromiun : Cent-browser, Opera maxthon 5.1 I have stopped trying because I think there are enough proofs
  16. to @No.1MaxthonFan and @Magdalene , Have you tried to log in with a digital certificate "from" those pages? . I know that the pages work, the error comes after trying to log in The problem is that the window to choose the digital certificate is not displayed. The configurations are exactly the same for v.5.1 as for v.5.2. In v.5.1, YES, jump the certificate choice screen. (The change of UA, has no effect). The links to login This is the window that has to come out and does not come out in v5.2,
  17. V5.2.1.5000, Errors on the web that request digital certificate follow. (capture above) And basically I got tired of trying the ones I usually use V. works correctly in all of them
  18. Unsolved Series v 5.2.x, error in the access to certified stores with the ultra core (series 5.1 yes they work) more
  19. There are a few threads/comments recent about it EDIT: Look to see if it works, I just edit it, there was an error
  20. What version of "Noads" do you have to work with v5.1.5.1000? I answer myself , seen in another post:
  21. Ningun problema por aqui, entro bien. Un Saludo.