nitro not better than maxton classic 4


Recommended Posts

Hello Nitro thant maxthon have the same problem like most of other web browser

4 gb ram 10 tab open and out of memery :curse:

after when you chrash classic maxthon 4 maxthon remember where you are all tab opened and you can reload all

nitro not possible by default :'(

nitro whith gmail display erreor message that the navigator is an old version :Q

with http://www.mon-navigateur.com/

or http://www.neodiffusion.fr/free-tools/quelle-est-la-signature-de-mon-navigateur.php

i see google 35

when i use a google 23 more older for test i havent this message ;P

after like maxthon 4 twitter security question boring :@

and for the fast comparative to other

chrome egal

firefox more speed

maxthon 4 egal

opera normal same speed

opera turbo more slow

remy beta tester for chrome and morte offten for firefox

allichamps@gmail.com

+336861420852

bye bye

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Nitro is faster than Mx 4.??

Look see and test here...

• Peacekeeper - free universal browser test - Futuremark

http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/

Score for Maxthon 4.4.1.5000 = 2201

Score for Maxthon Nitro (user agent / core = Chrome 35.0.1849.0 ) = 2240

• Flash Benchmark 2008 ( With Flash Player version 16.0.0.235 )

http://www.snailsanimation.com/benchmark08_play.php

Score for Maxthon 4.4.1.5000 = 10441

Score for Maxthon Nitro (user agent / core = Chrome 35.0.1849.0 ) = 11380

On a Win. 7 Ultimate, 64-bit, 8GB RAM,

with 10 browser tabs open and NOT out of memory.

No crash yet, in any browser... (^^,)

Best Regards Ohke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ohke replied at 2015-1-9 11:01 back.gif

My Nitro is faster than Mx 4.??

Look see and test here...

I ran my own tests on a Win7 Ennterprise w/ SP1, 64-bit, 3.9GB memory

installed. I also conv erted your results and mine to percentage of the corresponding Nitro result, since it's supposed to be faster.

Your results as perceentaages:

PK: 2201/2240 = 98.3%

FP: 10441/11380 = 91.7%

Yes, Nitro comes out ahead, but the PPK difference is irrelevant, less than 100 points (2.5% at 4000)

My results were different. I tested with the Flash player installed by default in each browser and using 16.0.0.x which is currrently installed in my machine.

For the Flash Benchmark, Mx4 was slower but not very significantly so.

Flash (M4) = 17229 (v 14.0.0.145) -- 98%

Flash (M4) = 16964 (v 16.0.0.235) -- 96%

Flash (Nitro)=17540 (v 14.0.0.177)

Flash (Nitro)= 17638 (v 16.0.0.240)

For Peacekeeper Mx4 was faster than Nitro, but again not by much.

PK (M4)= 4105 (v 14.0.0.145) -- 105%

PK (M4)= 3993 (v 16.0.0.235) -- 102%

PK (Nit)= 3925 (v 14.0.0.177)

PK (Nit)= 3919 (v 16.0.0.240)

In short, Nitro has a long way to go to deliver on its "speed" hype. In some aspects it's like lightning; in others you can make dinner waiting (a 'slight' exageration, but still true).

I'm hoping for improvement.

>

PS: Thanks for the links, particularly the Flash one.

http://www.snailsanimation.com/benchmark08_play.php

http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites