• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 



Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Everything posted by A.S.

  1. What about Extensions Center?

    If it's true, this is because of Mining Go and invitation codes. They could just disable comments for one extension.
  2. Hi. guys! I had to write about this many week ago, but... What's wrong with Extensions Center? Does it work? I tried to write reply, but I can not add new comment. Just white screen and nothing more. I hoped it's temporary, but it still does not work for me. Now I hope MX Team just preparing big update for Extensions Center and they have no reason to fix old bugs. Because we really need new Extensions Center: with notification and developer's pages. Now feedback is broken...
  3. AD Block extension missing

    Maxthon still has build-in AdBlock Plus, but now if you want to activate it, you have to install the extension.
  4. Adblocker?

    Can you write to me in DM? I did not use forum for many mounth and don't remember how it works. I can write what you have to do to broke browser by NoAds. If bug is fixed, MX will work fine.
  5. Adblocker?

    You always could do this, but it doesn't exist.Only old version of NoAds with critical bug. ABP for MX was ported by ABP team, not MX. This is official extension, just build-in browser. If you want to see uBlock, AdGurad, Adblock or something else, you should write to add-on developers. But uBlock is only one man. I don't think he will do this for one more browser... It's probably because of any build-in ad filter. Do you remember AdSkipper? The same story. Let's try to contact with NoAds developer. We need to know why it does not work. Maybe old bug is already fixed for MX5 or maybe MX Team can do something with this. But it does not matter untill we don't have connection with a guy who ported NoAds to MX. He's probably Russian. Нужно попробовать связаться с парнем, который портировал NoAds, и узнать, почему именно его расширение не работает. Возможно, баг уже исправили, когда обновляли браузер до MX5. Ну или, быть может, Maxthon смогут это исправить. В любом случае нам нужно с ним связаться. Он вроде бы русский, но у меня его найти не получилось...
  6. He said his email was lost and now he has to create a new account on Maxthon Passport. It's bad, because ha made add-ons and now he does not have access. I think MX Team can help and change email without verification via old email.Because they see when he was online and they can ask something to be sure that this is the same user. Or they can use phone number for this. But do we have any in MX Team who're ready to spend time for this?
  7. I'll just put it in here... This is the reason why now I'm not worried about Maxthon changes. They changed target audience. Old users don't like it, but it's OK. And maybe this is really right step for company (not for us, but globally this's not so important). Если нужен перевод на русский, найти его можно здесь. P.S. 1. BTW, comments on Extensions Center don't work. I can't reply and can't write rewiew. 2. If YouTube Center works on other browsers, the script may work on Maxthon too. Try to contact with developer or just use ViolentMonkey.
  8. breaks extensions.

    What about original script?
  9. Oh... I read your road map, and there is not what I was waiting for... There are common phrases: improvements, optimization, update, upgrade, etc. But what does it mean? Because even if I don't like what you do with you browser, I still know that you're working. I know that I'll see some improvements, some optimization, some update and some upgrade. But what will be these? I saw 3 important things only: Nitro, Blink and extensions. And even these are not so clear...
  10. Yep. But users need popular lists directly in ABP. There are regional lists only.
  11. I think this is something more than just "change ABP to uBlock"... ABP is not just extension, this is build-in tool and ABP Team (not MX) made it. But you can ask uBlock developer about this. Because uBlock may be just add-on, like NoAds. And users will have choice. I think any ABP improvements is more important question. Because this is still v.1.0.0 without manual blocking.
  12. Oh... It's good, but... times have changed... Now I need tool to protect my privacy: HTTPS Everywhere, Disconnect, Ghostery, Privacy Badger, etc. I can add Disconnect lists to ABP (btw, why there is not EasyPrivacy?), but what about HTTPS Everywhere or any analogue? Look on Brave (we both know that you know what Brave is). Brave has build-in tools for HTTPS-connection only. This about it. Tooday you really need it, you need it more that other browsers. And think about VPN and proxy. You have clear settings, but... I'm not sure that I can trust any proxy from the web. What about own service or third-party solution?
  13. What about http://extension.maxthon.com/server/go.php?guid=GUID links? Maxthon used this as permanent links to add-on pages: if add-on is available on Extensions Center, this page will be opened. This is "Details" in old versions of MX (MX3, MX4 and MX4.9), these links worked in any browsers. But today it does not work. Is this temporary troubles? Because I used thes links as feedback in my extensions and not it does not work for me. Should I remove Rate and Rewiew from my add-ons? As you need examples: Google Keep Pocket AccuWeather
  14. With new design you can open video in the middle of screen. With no black lines. I hoped this is just a script, but this extension is too difficult for me.
  15. But what about youtube.com/new?
  16. GMail reloading and SaveTube issue

    I think I fixed it. I'm not sure, but maybe... I'll make update and maube in will help. I just add excludes to def,json: "exclude": [ "*.gooogle.com", "google.com", "*mail.google.com", "mail.google.com"] UPD: Bad news. I fixed GMail issue only, but not other Google services...
  17. Hi, guys! I made SaveTube for MX, but honestly I don't know how it works. I just took the script and write that it have to be runned when page is loaded. There are list with websites where script have to be runned, but there is not any *.google.com sites. So I have no idea why it happens. But I test original script with ViolentMonkey and had the same result: page realods when I try to open new folder, but not "again and agian" as someone wrote, only once. Sebaro know about issue. He showed me the post with issue description. But he use Linux and can not test MX extension. So we know that this is problem of interaction between the script and browser. But we don't know the reason. In def.json I used these includes: "actions": [{ "type": "script", "entryPoints": ["doc_end"], "include": [ "*.youtube.com", "youtube.com", "*.dailymotion.com", "dailymotion.com", "*.vimeo.com", "vimeo.com", "*.metacafe.com", "metacafe.com", "*.break.com", "break.com", "*.funnyordie.com", "funnyordie.com", "*.veoh.com", "veoh.com", "*.viki.com", "viki.com", "*.imdb.com", "imdb.com",], "js": ["script.js"], }] In original SaveTube script: // @include http://youtube.com* // @include http://www.youtube.com* // @include https://youtube.com* // @include https://www.youtube.com* // @include http://gaming.youtube.com* // @include https://gaming.youtube.com* // @include http://m.youtube.com* // @include https://m.youtube.com* // @include http://dailymotion.com* // @include http://www.dailymotion.com* // @include https://dailymotion.com* // @include https://www.dailymotion.com* // @include http://vimeo.com* // @include http://www.vimeo.com* // @include https://vimeo.com* // @include https://www.vimeo.com* // @include http://metacafe.com* // @include http://www.metacafe.com* // @include https://metacafe.com* // @include https://www.metacafe.com* // @include http://break.com* // @include http://www.break.com* // @include https://break.com* // @include https://www.break.com* // @include http://funnyordie.com* // @include http://www.funnyordie.com* // @include https://funnyordie.com* // @include https://www.funnyordie.com* // @include http://veoh.com* // @include http://www.veoh.com* // @include https://veoh.com* // @include https://www.veoh.com* // @include http://viki.com* // @include http://www.viki.com* // @include https://viki.com* // @include https://www.viki.com* // @include http://imdb.com* // @include http://www.imdb.com* // @include https://imdb.com* // @include https://www.imdb.com* As I undestand, it mead that script or addon works on these websites only. There are not any *.google.com @Chantao was the first who wrote about this, and he did it July, 29. But I last SaveTube.mxaddon update was July, 2. Does it mean that all worked OK a few weeks? Maybe this is really problems of browser update? And I am still not sure that I understood you correctly. I made too many extensions to use all of these and I don't use MX as default anymore. So I am not sure that I understand what problem have other user. Maybe someone can make video with issue? I can send it to Sebaro. And what about Maxthon Team and real developers? Today we really need help. Because I'm not developer, I'm just user. I don't know how it works. I even have no idea how these script and extension can broke other website. Other post with this issue: forum.maxthon.com/index.php?/topic/22400-v-5104000-gmail-login-again-and-again/#comment-118830 forum.maxthon.com/index.php?/topic/22468-5104000-gmail-refreshes-onces-after-every-action/#comment-119038/ UPD: I added some excludes to def.json: "exclude": [ "*.gooogle.com", "google.com", "*.google.*", "google.*", "*mail.google.com", "mail.google.com"] And now GMail issue is solved. But I noticed the same reloading on YouTube and Google Maps. I can not fix it for YouTube (because SaveTube have to works on Youtube) and Google Maps (because Google use different domains for different countries) The simplest solution is just add to excludes all websites where you have this trouble. So where? P.S. I still don't know how it works and I need advice from developers.
  18. Hello ! (Add-on Dev)

    But what about MX5 tollbar icons? There are no SDK update, but today you use icon_32 if I don't write something else.
  19. Hello ! (Add-on Dev)

    BTW: If someone here knows how MX works and what you can do in the browser, this is @MaxthonJeff And now he see your question...
  20. Hello ! (Add-on Dev)

    Finally, someone who understands what he's doing! Bad news: there are not so many people, who understand how this browser works...
  21. Шаг 1. Собираем аддоны быстрого доступа для боковой панели. Шаг 2. Портируем простые расширения, написанные для других браузеров. Шаг 3. Собираем свое первое расширение, запускающее скрипт. Итак, мы уже умеем создавать аддоны быстрого доступа для боковой панели браузера Maxthon. Достижение, надо сказать, спорное. В Firefox подобного функционала можно добиться в пару кликов, но в Maxthon это выглядит лучше. А если попытаться и в Firefox или Chrome сделать это "красиво", то придется заморочиться. И заморочек будет больше, чем с Maxthon. Так или иначе, отныне нам не нужно обшаривать весь интернет ради простенького аддона с быстрым доступом. Если его нет в Maxthon Extentions Center, мы спокойно соберем свой. И будет нам счастье... В этот раз мы попытаемся портировать простенькое расширение, написанное под другой браузер. В нашем случае это будет Google Chrome. Будем надеяться, что всё будет работать как надо... Всё началось этим летом. Я клипал аддоны быстрого доступа пачками. Я не технарь, и первое время всё это казалось мне чем-то значимым. Спустя какое-то время мне захотелось большего, а Maxthon в то время дико глючил (до того HTML5 фикса). Особо напрягал YouTube, и я стал искать способы решения. Но решения нашлись только под Google Chrome. И это был новый челлендж! Итак, у нас есть расширение Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player для Google Chrome. Отрываем его. И что мы видим? Иконки, манифест и скрипт. По-моему, это не намного сложнее того, что мы делали до этого. И есть только один способ это узнать! Мы не будем заморачиваться с созданием новой папки и копированием. Порт так порт! Тупо подредактируем хромовское расширение так, чтобы оно могло работать в Maxthon. Создаем уже известную нам папку icons, переносим туда иконки. Помним, что иконки должны называться icon_48.png, icon_32.png и icon_16.png. Благо, в Хроме иконки тоже должны быть в формате .png, так что просто добавляем "_" в названия. Файл icon128.png можно вообще удалить. Файл manifest.json должен бы стать основой для нашего файла def.json, вот только он вообще не похож на то, что нам нужно. Но формат .json нам подходит. Поэтому тупо переименовываем файл, а его содержимое стираем. Новый файл def.json нам придется написать с нуля: Начинаем все, как обычно, с указания автора, которого я не знаю, и его сайта. [{ "author": "I don't know!" "website": "https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/disable-youtube-html5-pla/enmofgaijnbjpblfljopnpdogpldapoc" Поскольку для меня это был первый опыт работы с расширениями (до этого я только однажды подредактировал Google Quick Scroll, особо не вдаваясь в его работу), я допустил пару довольно грубых ошибок, которые пришлось исправлять. "date": "09.07.2014" "type":"extension", "frameworkVersion":"1.0.4", "version":"1.0.4", "guid": "{B8540D16-D967-4D6C-A9C4-3F19FB77DDFC}", "name": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player" "icon": "icon", "title": {"en": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player", "ru-ru": "Выключатель HTML5 на YouTube"}, "description": {"en": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player"} В графе "type" в этот раз указываем значение "script". Меняется и "entryPoints". Это и было моей первой ошибкой. Первая версия "моего" расширения запускалась по клику. Теперь я знаю, как это исправить: "actions": [{ "type": "script", "entryPoints": ["doc_start"], "js": ["script.js"] }] }] Конец. Таким образом, опуская мои объяснения у вас должно было получиться что-то вроде этого: [{ "author": "I don't know!" "website": "https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/disable-youtube-html5-pla/enmofgaijnbjpblfljopnpdogpldapoc" "date": "09.07.2014" "type":"extension", "frameworkVersion":"1.0.4", "version":"1.0.4", "guid": "{B8540D16-D967-4D6C-A9C4-3F19FB77DDFC}", "name": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player" "icon": "icon", "title": {"en": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player", "ru-ru": "Выключатель HTML5 на YouTube"}, "description": {"en": "Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player"} "actions": [{ "type": "script", "entryPoints": ["doc_start"], "js": ["script.js"] }] }] Еще раз: я понятия не имею, как это всё работает. Я узнаю все эмпирическим путем, тупо пробуя! Так что я понятия не имею, к чему это может привести. Так в Maxthon Extentions Center появилось расширение, переключающее YouTube-проигрыватель на flash, независимо от того, какой плеер по умолчанию был выбран. P.S. Мы переехали на новый форум. Старые обсуждения были любезно скопированны для нас администрацией. Вот только сделано это было, судя по всему, несколько месяцев назад. Мои посты уже давно выглядят не так. Да и оформление слетело. Пришлось редактировать. Так что, если что-то не сходится, или спрашивайте тут, или сверьтесь с оригинальным постом. Шаг 1. Собираем аддоны быстрого доступа для боковой панели. Шаг 2. Портируем простые расширения, написанные для других браузеров. Шаг 3. Собираем свое первое расширение, запускающее скрипт. Disable Youtube™ HTML5 Player BETA v.1.0.4.mxaddon
  22. Today I would like to talk about serious issue... So this post is addressed to the Maxthon Team and real true gangsta MLG add-on developers, who really understand how this magic work. In the times of MX3 we had AdHunter. It was a simple, but effective advertising filter. It had two big problems only: it does not have regional lists you could not block ads manually (untill latest versions) So some user (I know nick only and nothing more) make NoAds. It was a port from popular add-on for old Opera. There was regional lists and manual blocking, but... Because of some bug in Chromium code it did not work if you tried to use full lists. So... There were times when NoAds worked not so well and could even "break" browser: if you tried to use full lists you see empty white pages only and only deleting of folder with extension data solved the probmel. MX users don't like to read and so many people asked about this, that developer removed NoAds from Extensions Center. After a few months or years someone upload NoAds in Extensions Center again. I'm not sure that it was real developer, but today NoAds is available again. We saw that MX Team make some changes in MX5 to achieve better compatibility with some popular extensions. And I think that NoAds can really be usefull extension for many users, but I'm not sure that it works OK in MX5. I'm not sure that this is MX problem, maybe only Google can do something with this. But someone should look on this extension. Because there is manual blocking, but it's not exist in ABP. Alternative is always good!
  23. Нет. И вроде как не планируется. Зато планируется добавить расширения из Chrome WebStore. И настройки прокси довольно простые.
  24. A few days ago I installed MX5 to check how my extensions wokr there (some users wrote that they have problems). And I want to ask: What icon size is used in MX5 toolbar? Old versions of Maxthon used: icon_16.png for toolbar icon_32.png for sidebar and extensions page icon_48.png for Extensions Center I used 16x16 image for toolbar, but in MX5 it looks... a... as s it's blurry, stretched... I think the real size is about 24x24. And what about old versions? If I use bigger size, how will it look in MX4 for example? What do you think? Did you see something about this in new SDK? Is here new SDK? Or did you liik inside build-in extensions? UPD: OK. Let's talk about this minor change... This is icon_16 = 16p. In MX5 it looks awful! So I could change icon_16 size from 16p to 20p, And it will look OK: But this is MX5. How many users already moved to MX5? Many old users will use MX4.9 until the end of time! Look how icon_16 = 20p will look in old MX4: Not so bad? But look how it have to look (with icon_16 = 16p): I really hate MX at such moments! You took something that worked and broke it! And we can not fix it, because if we make well-defined icons for MX5, it will be blurred for MX4. But well-defined icons for MX4 anyway will be blurred in MX5. You did it! With no reason! Just because you made bigger UI in MX5. Great! Did we really need it?! What we have to do? Just wait when you do something? Maybe you can solve the issue as you did when add toolbar in MX4 for example. Or you never will do something and we have to change icon_16 size to 20p? Do you remember how many addons are these? I will not do it! I spent two days on simple expansion and minor updates! Because of toolbar icons only! Why? For what?
  25. The size of MX5 toolbar icons

    And we will have to change icons sizes in every extension what was be uploaded in Extensions Center from 2010. Great! Why do you break something that worked fine everytime when you release new browser? You broke toolbar icons (and all extensions with toolbar menu), skins and transparent sidebar icons (it works with some skins) when released MX4 in 2012. Some of these was not have not been returned until now! It mean that MX3 was better! And now you break toolbar icons, sidebar favorites, transparent sidebar icons (again), etc. Cool! You browser becames better and better... But MX3 had more! Read this. Take every MX stuff who don't know anything about mxaddons, choose mobile version of any popular Chinese website and make simple addon for sidebar panel.