pantantrollo

Members
  • Content count

    396
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Everything posted by pantantrollo

  1. No problem, v.5.2.6.1000 Portable, windows 10
  2. I ask the feature 3rd time !

    I think it's pretty clear from the 3rd post
  3. I can not find the post now, but I think it was something like that
  4. my profile

    If you have not already done so, you could try another machine with a portable version, log in to the maxthon account, and see what happens, if those extensions really appear If nothing happens, you have a problem with the local machine. Do the same in that local machine, but with different windows profiles (some new ones for example), and at least you will limit the problem
  5. my profile

    I think, I understood, that @-ody- has already explained that he has done clean installations (I do not know if any on a version portable), but that the problem is not local, but online. The extensions that are installed must come from the online account.
  6. Which Version Is coming soon ?

    It was a sarcasm
  7. Which Version Is coming soon ?

    I think it will bring great news, among the most outstanding and requested .... a new fund selector, which will be added a third line with 4 new colors
  8. GDPR

    ok, thanks, I see it
  9. GDPR

    It is not enough to say "maxthon will never collect information that can identify the identity". Maxthon as a company and provider of services in the EU, must comply with what the GDPR says. For now, it has not been sent, at least I have not received, an email with the measures and agreements by the provider (maxthon), how they will treat the data they have, and who is responsible (collector) of said data, so that it is known who is responsible for the custody of such data. Neither has been informed of the tools available to us as users of these services in order to cancel, modify etc our data in their possession. Services such as forums or https://www.uu.me, there is no possibility to delete the account and in this last service, there is also no possibility to delete the backup of the data you synchronize. As for the privacy of the url I visit, if I want to deactivate this feature in the browser settings, it no longer shows me the digital certificates of the SSL connection (https; //) of the web page, with what I see forced to have to activate its check box of " Enable secure URL scan" (without knowing what they do with this information) In summary, (and without being any expert in this matter, by the way) there are quite a few gaps in terms of compliance with the EU's GDPR.
  10. Closing Explorer closes Maxthon

    As you say@7twenty , better from the process tab, restart
  11. Facing Problem while accessing Wikipedia?

    Nor here with the portable version 5.2.6.1000
  12. And at least one file (or online), of help with the configuration elements well explained (or explained, because there are things that are not even explained)
  13. MX UI issues... let's make a list!

    I am still waiting (it will be over a year or so), to this translation. It would be something like "Herramienta de captura"
  14. Maxthon and Netflix

    You say seriously ?
  15. print issue

    I also work on windows 10 x64 Have you tried a clean installation? , the easiest way to download a portable version
  16. print issue

    No problem with official portable version 5.2.4.3000 Neither with portable version 5.2.5.2000 official, in clean installation
  17. !!! AT LAST !!!!, v5.2.4.3000 Portable Tested with the 3 links of this same thread (I've tried some more and it seems to work) Hoping it will not bother the next time you change core blink to a more modern one
  18. If you talk to me about banks, surely we are, again, talking about different things. In my country, Spain, (although I just had a quick look at some Frances), as far as I know, no bank uses a digital certificate for login, they are only used by state administrations and autonomous communities for negotiations with the public. I went through the forum in Spain to see if there was movement, and to be able to throw a question there as a test. It would not be too much for you to propose in that forum, that they will refuel you if they have errors with digital certificates of the fnmt, or any compatible and they will show you their results.
  19. I take it for granted that you are not deceiving me, of course, but I have not seen any evidence that what you say has worked (on the contrary, I have provided evidence to the contrary), and that is what I am asking. Reading the thread, until very recently, you did not understand what we were talking about when talking about a digital certificate, later not even the dev team seemed to have any to try these configurations, as you will understand, the fact that you have solved, as you say , the problems to some users, does not guarantee the fact that it is what has been fixed, and more without those tests that I ask (captures, videos, etc.), because we may be talking about different things again, isto what happened throughout this post And as I told you, if by users, we understand different machines, I already told you that in which I manage does NOT work as it should, neither in current OS like win10, neither in win8.1, nor in win7 (with different configurations, different installed programs, newly installed OS, etc, and always from the maxthon 5.2.xxx series, with clean maxthon installations. Sincerely, I do not know the development team, has come to perform as many tests as I do in this 4 months in different machines, seriously, I only ask you, those tests that work for you, if not, I can not believe you, I'm sorry. (I know what I see, and you have also seen the same, but I have not seen anything that you tell me)
  20. I understand that you have tested them too with other users, is that true? Can you put the screenshots or videos of how it works correctly what I said above? Because I'm putting in this thread a lot of info commenting on the error, but I do not see that after that statement you have put something that tells me otherwise. Does your digital certificate have a passwd for use when the browser accesses this certificate? Can you confirm this last?
  21. Sorry to disappoint the development team, but it has NOT been corrected, I'm sorry for you (I manage a lot of machines with different OS and configurations and the same thing happens in all of them) As it is said here, it is not a good idea to sell the milk before having the cow. The truth is that after many months with this problem I am already tired of lending my time and desire, seriously, and more seeing that I think they do not even test what is indicated and how they are indicated. Because one thing is that they do not know how to fix it, I would understand it, but another is that even if they do not know what they are talking about, what makes them think
  22. I, (neither my machine or configuration), we have no problem Feeling it a lot is not going to be possible. On the one hand the wifi connection that I have (3 mg down / 1 mg up) "barely" gives for web browsing, and on the other the issue of digital certificates is sensitive enough to allow support on that same issue via remote control. You just have to check it (as it has been repeated throughout all these previous months), with the series 5.1.xxx (and previous series), and you will quickly see what is happening (which you probably already know too well, but not how to fix it)
  23. It seems that there is less work left to do At least with the blink engine, it finally asks for the digital certificate, although it still gives an error when it should ask for the password to access the certificate In contrast with IE engine or versions 5.1.xxx, this is the result