pantantrollo

Members
  • Content count

    530
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Release Notes

Bug Tracker

Help page

Help page-CN

Release Note5

Rules and recruitment

Everything posted by pantantrollo

  1. MX5 PC Official Release 5.3.8.2000

    Ironic mode on // On Dec 25 (2 months later), for Christmas gift we will have the beta v.5.3.8.2001 Ironic mode off //
  2. Update the browser?

    Apparently, it is necessary to deselect the user agent, (or leave the chrome or other more generic) and allow cookies from third parties.
  3. Update the browser?

    It also doesn't work for me here with that version of maxthon portable. My user agent (from these same forums) Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Windows NT 10.0; U; WOW64; IA64; en) AppleWebKit/599.0+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Maxthon/5.3.8.2000 Chrome/78.0.3904.97 Safari/537.36 OPR/64.0.3417.92 QupZilla/2.2.6
  4. What's wrong with Extensions Center?

    As an addition to what Toni says, which I affirm Community? but is there a community? If these forums, which could be the basis of your representation, do not have any movement to be able to be called, "community".
  5. It's no longer works?

    I know Adguard and I use it for free as addons in other browsers with "chrome" core (chromiun, Edge, Opera, VIvaldi, etc..).
  6. It's no longer works?

    It works badly, it gets many ads (I have 8 lists, the same as for the 5.2.7.5000, with which it works better)
  7. Unquoted Search Path and Potential Abuses

    So there are "external" errors ? It means, that the "other" bugs reported from these same forums, and fixed by the development team, are included in the "change.log", "by the infuse science"...
  8. Unquoted Search Path and Potential Abuses

    Good link :-) , thx Fortunately the portable version doesn't have mxservice.exe. Even so, for my part, I have renamed some .dll and .exe, which I never liked (some related to synchronization that I don't use), and it still works without apparent problems (and they are a few renamed files).
  9. MX5 PC Official Release 5.3.8.2000

    Don't worry, in a month or so, they release version 5.3.8.2xxx Beta, to fix this stable version As for version 6, in my humble opinion (I hope I'm wrong, seriously), I don't think it's going to be built, it's hard enough for them to get versions and fixes of these last ones, as to dedicate time to start a new project. What's more, the big support has always come from this community, where is it?, then in better places, obviously
  10. When it arrives, it will already have a very delayed blink core (more insecure and without the security corrections that are added)
  11. Reactivate AD Blockplus

  12. Reactivate AD Blockplus

    Did you deactivate the extension, or stopped blocking the page you mentioned? To activate it again, from settings / functions and addons To re-block the page, from the extension itself (red icon, top right)
  13. ABP update option has suddenly disappeared

    First, I think you should upgrade to some newer stable version. Since version that you have been quite stable versions. Locate within your profile de maxthon, the \AdBlock\ folder, with closed maxthon, delete it or better rename it. In theory, you will only see a single list, with which you will have to reconfigure it.
  14. MX UI issues... let's make a list!

    I am still waiting (it will be over a year or so), to this translation. It would be something like "Herramienta de captura"
  15. Maxthon and Netflix

    You say seriously ?
  16. !!! AT LAST !!!!, v5.2.4.3000 Portable Tested with the 3 links of this same thread (I've tried some more and it seems to work) Hoping it will not bother the next time you change core blink to a more modern one
  17. If you talk to me about banks, surely we are, again, talking about different things. In my country, Spain, (although I just had a quick look at some Frances), as far as I know, no bank uses a digital certificate for login, they are only used by state administrations and autonomous communities for negotiations with the public. I went through the forum in Spain to see if there was movement, and to be able to throw a question there as a test. It would not be too much for you to propose in that forum, that they will refuel you if they have errors with digital certificates of the fnmt, or any compatible and they will show you their results.
  18. I take it for granted that you are not deceiving me, of course, but I have not seen any evidence that what you say has worked (on the contrary, I have provided evidence to the contrary), and that is what I am asking. Reading the thread, until very recently, you did not understand what we were talking about when talking about a digital certificate, later not even the dev team seemed to have any to try these configurations, as you will understand, the fact that you have solved, as you say , the problems to some users, does not guarantee the fact that it is what has been fixed, and more without those tests that I ask (captures, videos, etc.), because we may be talking about different things again, isto what happened throughout this post And as I told you, if by users, we understand different machines, I already told you that in which I manage does NOT work as it should, neither in current OS like win10, neither in win8.1, nor in win7 (with different configurations, different installed programs, newly installed OS, etc, and always from the maxthon 5.2.xxx series, with clean maxthon installations. Sincerely, I do not know the development team, has come to perform as many tests as I do in this 4 months in different machines, seriously, I only ask you, those tests that work for you, if not, I can not believe you, I'm sorry. (I know what I see, and you have also seen the same, but I have not seen anything that you tell me)
  19. I understand that you have tested them too with other users, is that true? Can you put the screenshots or videos of how it works correctly what I said above? Because I'm putting in this thread a lot of info commenting on the error, but I do not see that after that statement you have put something that tells me otherwise. Does your digital certificate have a passwd for use when the browser accesses this certificate? Can you confirm this last?
  20. Sorry to disappoint the development team, but it has NOT been corrected, I'm sorry for you (I manage a lot of machines with different OS and configurations and the same thing happens in all of them) As it is said here, it is not a good idea to sell the milk before having the cow. The truth is that after many months with this problem I am already tired of lending my time and desire, seriously, and more seeing that I think they do not even test what is indicated and how they are indicated. Because one thing is that they do not know how to fix it, I would understand it, but another is that even if they do not know what they are talking about, what makes them think
  21. I, (neither my machine or configuration), we have no problem Feeling it a lot is not going to be possible. On the one hand the wifi connection that I have (3 mg down / 1 mg up) "barely" gives for web browsing, and on the other the issue of digital certificates is sensitive enough to allow support on that same issue via remote control. You just have to check it (as it has been repeated throughout all these previous months), with the series 5.1.xxx (and previous series), and you will quickly see what is happening (which you probably already know too well, but not how to fix it)
  22. It seems that there is less work left to do At least with the blink engine, it finally asks for the digital certificate, although it still gives an error when it should ask for the password to access the certificate In contrast with IE engine or versions 5.1.xxx, this is the result
  23. In the internal beta 1200, crash error too