pantantrollo

Members
  • Content count

    527
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

178 Excellent

About pantantrollo

  • Rank
    Intermediate Mage

Profile Information

  • Gender Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

7,418 profile views
  1. What's wrong with Extensions Center?

    As an addition to what Toni says, which I affirm Community? but is there a community? If these forums, which could be the basis of your representation, do not have any movement to be able to be called, "community".
  2. It's no longer works?

    I know Adguard and I use it for free as addons in other browsers with "chrome" core (chromiun, Edge, Opera, VIvaldi, etc..).
  3. It's no longer works?

    It works badly, it gets many ads (I have 8 lists, the same as for the 5.2.7.5000, with which it works better)
  4. Unquoted Search Path and Potential Abuses

    So there are "external" errors ? It means, that the "other" bugs reported from these same forums, and fixed by the development team, are included in the "change.log", "by the infuse science"...
  5. Unquoted Search Path and Potential Abuses

    Good link :-) , thx Fortunately the portable version doesn't have mxservice.exe. Even so, for my part, I have renamed some .dll and .exe, which I never liked (some related to synchronization that I don't use), and it still works without apparent problems (and they are a few renamed files).
  6. MX5 PC Official Release 5.3.8.2000

    Don't worry, in a month or so, they release version 5.3.8.2xxx Beta, to fix this stable version As for version 6, in my humble opinion (I hope I'm wrong, seriously), I don't think it's going to be built, it's hard enough for them to get versions and fixes of these last ones, as to dedicate time to start a new project. What's more, the big support has always come from this community, where is it?, then in better places, obviously
  7. Save as Image

    I reiterate the above
  8. Save as Image

    I think all versions have maintained that characteristic. At least, the latest stable version and beta, include it
  9. New version of maxthon ??

    Thx I also continue to use it, at least with web pages without the least importance in terms of security, but for the web of banking entities, public administrations and everything that involves some kind of sensitive exchange of information, no, at least until it is updated the cores with the latest security patches that are applied to the chromiun core
  10. New version of maxthon ??

    It looks like a Telegram message, is there a channel for it?
  11. A farewell from a loyal user...

    Mathon is already dead, a long time ago. He has been anchored in the past a lot, at least his cores, the development is almost null and what ends all this, is his community, which, practically has disappeared.
  12. New version of maxthon ??

    Surely, or Opera, I vote for either. If I have the strength to join one of these communities again, we will surely meet again , 7twenty, I have already seen it, in passing, by those of vivaldi
  13. Any roadmap to go to 5.3.9.xx (o 5.4.xxx) with more modern blink core? We have been with the beta since February, with core 69.xx, and without being stable, it is already too old and surely full of security holes. Of the stable version, almost better not to mention how old the core is
  14. When it arrives, it will already have a very delayed blink core (more insecure and without the security corrections that are added)
  15. Hi brother,
    I have read all your lines about the security of maxthon. And I would like you to recommend me which version of maxthon is similar, with the same features even "resource sniffer"   In your experience, please!

     

     

     

    1. pantantrollo

      pantantrollo

      Good,

      (first of all, I'm not an expert on anything, just a normal user :))

      Well I would not know what is the most recommended version in terms of security, basically because Maxthon is a little used browser and therefore little audited by the real experts (not so with opera and vivaldi that is their communities of people there are more movement)

      To be honest, !! We are sold !! :), that's why you would almost like to use one version than another. I usually use the last stable of the series 5.

      But the versions that I liked the most, are the last stable of the series 4. 4.4.x and 4.9.x. They seemed lighter, more configurable. But of course, now they have very old nuclei (although the 5.2.x series, it has a 61.x blink core and it is sure that it has enough security holes at the moment.

      In the end, without knowing code or deep security issues, everything falls on the implementation that is made in the browsers of the core blink (chromiun) is as current as possible (vivaldi, opera, MSEdge etc), if not, is to be played as with any outdated software.

      sorry for me English (googletized)